"WASHINGTON REDSKINS BIG BACKS OF CENTRAL OKLAHOMA STATE, PART ONE"
HELMET HUT NEWS/REFLECTIONS December 2017:
"WASHINGTON REDSKINS BIG
BACKS OF CENTRAL OKLAHOMA STATE,
PART ONE"
By Dr. Ken
My wife was
born at the
University
of Minnesota
Hospital
when her
father was
completing
his PhD at
the
University
and then
raised in
West
Lafayette,
Indiana
where he
taught at
Purdue
University
and served
as Director
of Grain
Research. By
any
standard,
her family,
even with
the
interplay of
six
siblings,
would have
fallen
within the
category of
“normal.” My
long-time
friend and
fellow
football
fanatic
Richard
Landsman and
I always
believed
that we
lived within
the confines
of “normal
families”
and it
wasn’t until
gaining
decades of
perspective,
observation
of my wife’s
family, and
later
conversations
with Rich
where we
frankly
discussed
the many
events of
our
childhood
that we
realized
that “maybe
we didn’t
grow up that
normally.” I
believe that
every male
child I grew
up with was
punished in
a manner
that today,
would no
doubt be
considered
“abusive”
but corporal
punishment
at home in
the form of
physical
correction
and paddling
at school
was
standard.
None of us
blinked or
thought
about it,
getting
smacked or
punched at
home and
paddled in
front of
one’s class
in school
was “the
usual.” We
believed
that
everyone’s
family laid
claim to
someone who
had been
accused of,
indicted
for, gone on
trial and/or
was
convicted of
a crime that
sent them to
prison. We
believed
that
everyone old
enough to
attend high
school knew
the local
bookmakers,
was on a
first name
basis with
real-live
Mafia
members,
accepted
that high
school
coaches bet
on the
outcome of
their games,
and
understood
the
quid-pro-quo
of doing
business in
order to
prevent a
mishap like
fire
bombing. It
took quite a
number of
decades to
figure out
that this
might have
been
standard for
us but not
necessarily
normal. I do
however hold
the belief
that growing
up in the
manner which
we did gave
us many
advantages.
For those
like me who
do not
gamble,
allow me to
digress and
provide a
quick lesson
in how that
end of the
world works.
At the
racetracks
located in
the United
States,
perhaps with
some
alterations
due to
specific
state
regulations,
Internal
Revenue Code
Section
3402(q)(3)(c)
is the order
of the day
and states
that “a
gaming
facility is
required to
withhold
from
proceeds of
more than
$5,000
involving ‘a
wagering
transaction
in a
pari-mutuel
pool with
respect to
horse races,
dog races,
or jai alai
if the
amount of
such
proceeds is
at least 300
times as
large as the
amount
wagered.’”
This
legalese
translates
to “Yes
Virginia,
you have to
pay income
taxes on
money won at
the race
track.” One
advantage of
knowing all
of the
bookies and
at times,
going to New
York City’s
Aqueduct
Race Track
with my
father who
was a
compulsive
gambler, was
the
responsibility
of serving
as the day’s
runner. I
did not
necessarily
like going
to the race
track,
certainly
not on a
Saturday
where like
every other
ten or
eleven year
old I just
wanted to be
on the
street
playing
ball.
However,
this was one
of the best
paying jobs
anyone could
have, even
for an adult
so I never
complained,
not that my
objections
would have
been
considered.
As per the
tax code,
when a lot
of money was
bet and a
lot of money
was won, the
group of men
I was with
which was
truly a
conglomerate
of hard core
gamblers and
those they
bet with,
some
“connected”
and some
not, could
never go to
the windows
to collect
their
winnings.
Fill out
forms? Pay
taxes? The
bookmakers
and bad guys
at least
lived under
the radar
and even the
normal
citizens
within the
group were
not going to
claim wins
or losses
from their
daily or
weekly
gambling
runs. Thus,
a youngster,
me in this
instance,
would be
given
thousands of
dollars,
have it
stuffed into
my shirt
with written
instructions,
and provided
with the
directive to
go only to
one or two
specific
windows and
insure that
“Vincent,
John, or
Pat” was the
pari-mutual
clerk on
duty. Bets
were made,
tickets
returned to
the men in
the group of
box seats by
the finish
line, and if
there were
winning
tickets, I
would return
to pick up
the
earnings, at
times
placing a
paper bag
containing
up to
$25,000.00
or more into
my jacket or
shirt.
Of course
the clerk
handling the
bets would
keep $50.00
or $100.00
from each
pot but my
reward
“tips” could
have totaled
$100.00 or
more in any
afternoon
and my
father often
allowed me
to keep most
of it, at
times
needing the
rest to get
through his
own day of
gambling.
The greatest
advantage of
knowing the
bookies
however was
being
allowed to
browse
through and
often keep
items from
their
collection
of football
guides and
programs. If
gambling on
football is
your
business, it
was only
smart
business to
have access
to as much
information
about every
team as was
possible.
Their
offices or
“fronts”
always had
out of town
newspapers,
media
guides, and
programs
from games
one or two
weeks prior
to whatever
day I came
in to pay
off my
father’s
bets. I
would sit,
glued to the
game
programs,
reading
every word
in the
advertising
as well as
rosters,
line-ups,
and coaching
biographies.
When I went
off to
college, one
of the
bookmakers
used to give
his programs
to my father
who would
dutifully
construct a
package and
mail them
out to me.
Although it
arrived in
November, I
can recall
receiving
the October
3, 1965
Detroit
Lions vs.
the
Washington
Redskins
program. Joe
Don Looney,
the Lions’
running back
who had
provided me
with my
first
written,
organized
strength
training
program, was
featured in
that issue’s
“Lions
ACTION
Photo” on
page forty
but it was
the roster
and line-ups
that caught
my
attention.